home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Marc says:
-
- > I haven't had time to type up my feelings in any detail yet, but at this
- > point I think that dealing with SGML in general is a complete waste of time
- > and that we'd currently be a lot further along if we weren't burdened by the
- > SGML baggage we've inherited and are still carrying. 99.99% of the people
- > I talk to want to put rich documents online, want control over what it looks
- > like, and don't give a damn about semantic markup or distinctions between
- > document structure and appearance AT ALL; the other 0.01% are still
- > grappling with this whole keyboard-monitor-mouse concept.)
-
- So why don't we lobby Adobe to put in URL based links into its next version
- of Postscript and go home now?
-
- Seriously - how much interest is there in a non-proprietary, lightweight
- extendable format derived from HTML? Am I barking up the wrong tree with
- HTML+ ?
-
- Dave Raggett
-
-